General information, not legal advice. Talk to a licensed attorney in your state.

Independent guide · not a government website

Glossary

Comparative negligence

A rule that splits blame between the people involved and cuts your recovery by your own share of fault.

Last reviewed By the Editorial team 2 min read

General information, not legal advice. Talk to a licensed attorney in your state.

Quick answer

Comparative negligence is a rule that splits the blame for a crash among the people involved and cuts each person's recovery by their own share of fault. If you are found 20% at fault, you can recover 80% of your proven damages, as long as your state's rule does not bar the claim.

In a car accident claim#

Most states use some form of comparative negligence, but the versions differ. Under pure comparative fault, used in 9 jurisdictions, you recover your damages minus your share of fault, even if you were mostly to blame. Under Modified comparative fault. Comparative negligence with a cut-off: once your share of blame reaches the state's bar (50% or 51%), you recover nothing. Glossary, you lose the claim once your share reaches a bar: 51% in 26 jurisdictions, including Texas, and 50% in 10. A few places still follow the older Contributory negligence. An older rule, still used in a few places, under which any fault of your own can bar you from recovering anything. Glossary rule.

Fault shares matter long before any trial. Insurers use them in negotiation, so evidence that you were speeding, distracted or missed a signal can cut an offer. The fault-rule explainer shows how each state treats a given share, the car accidents guide explains how fault is proven, and our state guides list each state's rule.

Example#

Questions people ask

What is the difference between pure and modified comparative negligence?

Under a pure rule, you can recover something at any share of fault below 100%. Under a modified rule, you recover nothing once your share reaches the state's bar, either 50% or 51%.

Who decides each driver's percentage of fault?

During negotiation, each insurer forms its own view, and the two sides bargain over it. If the case goes to trial, a jury or judge decides the percentages.

Sources

  1. Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute, Wex: comparative negligence — general definition, pure and modified rules
  2. Texas Legislature, Civil Practice and Remedies Code chapter 33 — an example of a 51% bar

Last reviewed October 29, 2026 by the Accident Claim Facts editorial team. Found an error? Tell us.

Keep reading

  1. GlossaryGlossaryShort, plain-English definitions of the legal and insurance terms that come up after a crash, each with an example, related terms and the sources behind it.Reviewed
  2. ToolFault-rule explainer: how your share of blame changes a claimSlide your share of the blame and choose a state to see whether its fault rule lets you recover, and what share of your proven damages you could still claim.Reviewed
  3. Accident typesCar accidentsA car accident claim asks the driver who caused the crash, through their insurer, to pay for your losses. Fault rules, no-fault laws, policy limits and…Reviewed
  4. States and citiesStates A–ZFiling deadlines for injury, vehicle damage and wrongful death claims, and the fault rule, for all 50 states and Washington, DC, each linked to the statute or…Reviewed
  5. GlossaryContingency feeA lawyer's fee paid as a share of what you recover. If there is no recovery, there is usually no fee.Reviewed
  6. GlossaryContributory negligenceAn older rule, still used in a few places, under which any fault of your own can bar you from recovering anything.Reviewed

    Try “deadline”, “Texas” or “demand letter”. Press Enter to open a result.